• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Russian Best

Russian Life & People Digest

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Questions and Answers
    • History and Politics
    • Culture and Science
    • People and Language
    • Lifestyle and Attributes
    • Russian Sports
    • Food and Drinks
    • Traveling Russia
    • Economy and Geography
    • Russian Military
    • Books & Movies
Browse: Home / History and Politics

Should the Russian Federation have changed the cities names?

Question by Maxwell: Do You think that the Russian Federation should have changed the cities names when the USSR broke up?
Like Gorki to Nizhny Novgorod Leningrad to St. Petersburg ect. I know they used to be called St. Petersburg but I think The USSR names were better.

Answers and Views:

Answer by АРТУША
It’s hard to say. Younger kids who grew up/ are growing up in Russia use post Soviet names while grown ups and my relatives especially use the old names. Everyone understands both. The only problem with the USSR names is that constitutionally, fundamentally none of that exists anymore. Yes, it culturally exists yet it depends on what you want to emphasize.

Read all the answers in the comments.

What do you think?

See other posts in History and Politics

Reader Interactions

Comments ( 5 )

  1. snowdrop says

    Actually, many of those names were changed during the USSR time. So, now they are just changing them back as it used to be, as Peterburg, it was built by Peter1, so what was the point of changing it to Leningrad, or Ulyanovsk that used to be Simbirsk. i think it is better to have the original names that used to be before USSR, its our history

    Reply
  2. Dmitry says

    I prefer the historical names.
    To name cities and streets names of politicians bad idea.
    Though there are also bad names. For example, Vagonoremontnaya (carriage-repair) street. terribly

    Reply
  3. Cossak says

    Tzaritsin-Stalingrad-Volgograd…better have one name from birth dates of city,like mine.

    Reply
  4. rob says

    well most of the soviet names were monuments to the leaders of the communist regime or the regime itself so… it dependes on you want to glorifyy their achievements good and bad.and it most certainly is a habitual thing to. i think changing the names back was a way to kind of remove more soviet influence and move in a diffrent direction.

    Reply
  5. Misanthropist says

    I think historic names should be kept in general. However, St. Petersburg is a special case (at least to me it is), because it suffered the blockade under the name of Leningrad, so I think that changing the name kind of distances the city from a crucial part of its history. In most cases I prefer the pre-communist names, simply because they are more pleasant to the ear.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Popular Posts

Pushkin's Tatiana writing a letter to Onegin

Onegin’s Tatiana Was Only Thirteen?

Russian shashlik

My Favorite Russian Food

Dacha – Home Away From Home

Subway Dog

Subway Dogs of Moscow

Cape Cod on the Rocks

What is a cocktail with vodka and cranberry juice called?

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Pat on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • Ted on Where can i send free SMS messages to Russian mobiles?
  • PutinPow on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • bigdogg on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • HAMISH A McDONALD on What Russia would be like today if Nicholas II had not been executed?

Copyright RussianBest.com © 2025 · About · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer: RussianBest.com is an informational website, and its content does not constitute professional advice of any kind.