• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Russian Best

Russian Life & People Digest

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Questions and Answers
    • History and Politics
    • Culture and Science
    • People and Language
    • Lifestyle and Attributes
    • Russian Sports
    • Food and Drinks
    • Traveling Russia
    • Economy and Geography
    • Russian Military
    • Books & Movies
Browse: Home / History and Politics

What bad political decisions did Tsar Nicholas II make?

Question by : What bad political decisions did Tsar Nicholas II make?
During his reign of Russia in the 1900’s Tsar Nicholas II (the last Tsar of Russia) made many bad political decisions that lead to the Russian Revolution of 1917. What were they?
need quick, but i give away best answer real easy

Answers and Views:

Answer by Randy
After Russia’s stinging defeat in the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905, there was great upheaval. Nicky made a lot of promises for democratic reform but then reneged on them. Even so, the people were much better off under the Czar than they were under the Bolsheviks.

Read all the answers in the comments.

Give your own answer to this question!

See other posts in History and Politics

Reader Interactions

Comments ( 1 )

  1. Spellbound says

    Nicholas II was an autocrat, in other words he ruled by himself, no parliament, only advisors and ministers to carry out his orders. Unfortunately for him, and for Russia, he was vain, stupid, overly religious and badly advised.

    Nicholas made a lot of very poor decisions, beginning in 1904 when he decided to attack the Japanese over the ownership of Port Arthur. This “easy victory” turned into a resounding defeat and led directly to the 1905 Revolution.

    The 1905 Revolution established a parliament – the State Duma, which should have seen Russia on the road to be coming a constitutional monarchy, like Britain or Sweden. However, Nicholas allowed it to meet, and then politically neutered it, robbing it of its authority and powers.

    He could have weathered this storm, perhaps, if he hadn’t plunged Russia into WWI. The war was a disaster for Russia, and, when the he took personal command of the army – the people blamed him for the way that the war was turning out.

    Eventually the resentment turned from anger to hatred and, in February 1917, the women of Petrograd marched on the Winter Palace and Nicholas abdicated.
    He was arrested on charges of treason, and held in various locations until he ended up, with his family in the Ipatiev house in Ekaterinburg in Western Siberia. Here, on July 17 1918 he, along with his entire family and their servants were taken to the basement and shot.

    See:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/nicholas_ii.shtml
    http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/nicholas.htm

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Popular Posts

Pushkin's Tatiana writing a letter to Onegin

Onegin’s Tatiana Was Only Thirteen?

Russian shashlik

My Favorite Russian Food

Dacha – Home Away From Home

Subway Dog

Subway Dogs of Moscow

Cape Cod on the Rocks

What is a cocktail with vodka and cranberry juice called?

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Pat on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • Ted on Where can i send free SMS messages to Russian mobiles?
  • PutinPow on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • bigdogg on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • HAMISH A McDONALD on What Russia would be like today if Nicholas II had not been executed?

Copyright RussianBest.com © 2025 · About · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer: RussianBest.com is an informational website, and its content does not constitute professional advice of any kind.