• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Russian Best

Russian Life & People Digest

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Questions and Answers
    • History and Politics
    • Culture and Science
    • People and Language
    • Lifestyle and Attributes
    • Russian Sports
    • Food and Drinks
    • Traveling Russia
    • Economy and Geography
    • Russian Military
    • Books & Movies
Browse: Home / History and Politics

Why was denunciation of Stalin so hard to accept for many Soviets?

Question by Tfranks: Why was Khrushchev’s denunciation of Stalin so hard for many Soviets to accept?
So far, I have stated that:

Khrushchev refers to the Stalinist cult that held citizens of the Soviet Union in its thrall for so long. People had been controlled and brainwashed having Stalinist principles driven into their heads, many from birth. They were either unknowledgeable about anything outside of or before Stalin, or too fearful to even consider other paths of thought. To have these beliefs questioned for the first time was incomprehensible for many.
Leninism praised morality and principle beliving that the people were central to progression. He despised individualism and never imposed his views on another. His beliefs held that people should be persuaded, not forced to make decisions and formulate opinions. Stalin abused his power and became paranoid of any challenges to his regime. He did not explain his motives nor did he try to justify his intent. Dissenters and subversives were severely persecuted or executed and freedom was confiscated from the people. This demand of absolute submission had rendered the Soviet people amenable. Though many were enduring horrible oppression, the steps necessary for change risked far worse.

This is part of a large report Im writing.
Sound good?
@ Spellbound
A direct excerpt from Khrushchevs secret speech states: “..While ascribing great importance to the role of the leaders and organizers of the masses, Lenin at the same time mercilessly stigmatized every manifestation of the cult of the individual… Khrushchev than goes on to emphasize how Lenin always patiently explained his opinions – all while contrasting to Stalin.
and I was not suggesting that Khrushchev claimed the people were brainwashed, I was merely stating it as general fact.

Thank you for your input it is greatly appreciated

Answers and Views:

Answer by Bob Smith
An important note is that freedom of press and freedom of speech were not allowed in the USSR. With pervasive government propoganda and not many detractors, Stalin was known as a hero to his people (outside nations knew the truth).

Read all the answers in the comments.

Add your own answer!

See other posts in History and Politics

Reader Interactions

Comments ( 1 )

  1. hironymus says

    There are people there to this day who think of Stalin as some kind of hero. Intensive brain washing can do that to people. They simply refuse to believe he had all these millions imprisoned or killed.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Popular Posts

Pushkin's Tatiana writing a letter to Onegin

Onegin’s Tatiana Was Only Thirteen?

Russian shashlik

My Favorite Russian Food

Dacha – Home Away From Home

Subway Dog

Subway Dogs of Moscow

Cape Cod on the Rocks

What is a cocktail with vodka and cranberry juice called?

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Pat on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • Ted on Where can i send free SMS messages to Russian mobiles?
  • PutinPow on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • bigdogg on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • HAMISH A McDONALD on What Russia would be like today if Nicholas II had not been executed?

Copyright RussianBest.com © 2025 · About · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer: RussianBest.com is an informational website, and its content does not constitute professional advice of any kind.