• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Russian Best

Russian Life & People Digest

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Questions and Answers
    • History and Politics
    • Culture and Science
    • People and Language
    • Lifestyle and Attributes
    • Russian Sports
    • Food and Drinks
    • Traveling Russia
    • Economy and Geography
    • Russian Military
    • Books & Movies
Browse: Home / History and Politics

Why wasnt the Russian army behind Nicholas II during the 1917 revolution?

Question by : Why wasnt the army behind Tsar Nicholas II during the 1917 revolution?
I know why the army was behind him in 1905, but im confused witth the cause of them not being behind him in 1917, please help 🙂

Answers and Views:

Answer by JosF
The army had had enough, much more than enough of being canon fodder. Not just the rank-and-file. Also the lower and medium ranking officers, up to and including quite a few generals.

Read all the answers in the comments.

Give your own answer to this question!

See other posts in History and Politics

Reader Interactions

Comments ( 2 )

  1. david says

    In 1914 WW I began and Russia entered the war. From the beginning it was a disaster. The army was large, but poorly organized, never enough supplies, not enough guns, and very poorly trained. The Germans although smaller in numbers were far better trained and much better armed and had the advantage of fighting near their border.
    Also the Russians were also victims of German chemical attacks( some believe before their use in the West) and unlike the Allies they suffered heavy casualties and never learned how to protect themselves.

    But worst of all was the dismal leadership. Nicholas insisted in being in charge of the army, despite having no military training or experience. His generals could not tell him anything. So the troops are wet, muddy and freezing to death, while also being gassed and shot by the Germans, never enough food, low on ammo, and losing battle after battle. Morale was rock bottom. At home, the economy was shot, people were starving. That’s it, they had it. Because of his incompetence, and his stubborn, bullheaded refusal to listen to anyone(after all I was appointed by God to be your King, there fore I am infallible) he manged to get himself and the whole royal family killed.

    Reply
  2. Emily says

    By the Russian Revolution many people were starving to death, including the army, because there was hardly any food in Russia. The Russian people were led to believe that the Romanovs were eating just as well as before when there wasn’t any famine in the country. The Bolsheviks had ideals that were more pleasing to the Roman people.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Popular Posts

Pushkin's Tatiana writing a letter to Onegin

Onegin’s Tatiana Was Only Thirteen?

Russian shashlik

My Favorite Russian Food

Dacha – Home Away From Home

Subway Dog

Subway Dogs of Moscow

Cape Cod on the Rocks

What is a cocktail with vodka and cranberry juice called?

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Pat on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • Ted on Where can i send free SMS messages to Russian mobiles?
  • PutinPow on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • bigdogg on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • HAMISH A McDONALD on What Russia would be like today if Nicholas II had not been executed?

Copyright RussianBest.com © 2025 · About · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer: RussianBest.com is an informational website, and its content does not constitute professional advice of any kind.