• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Russian Best

Russian Life & People Digest

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Questions and Answers
    • History and Politics
    • Culture and Science
    • People and Language
    • Lifestyle and Attributes
    • Russian Sports
    • Food and Drinks
    • Traveling Russia
    • Economy and Geography
    • Russian Military
    • Books & Movies
Browse: Home / History and Politics

Would Russia be better under the Tsar?

Question by Sean: Would Russia be better under the Tsar or the Soviets?
Out of those two options what do you think?
No, its Tsar. It even says Tsar in your wikipedia article.

Answers and Views:

Answer by oldsouldier’s Never Die
Obama would be loved in Russia, he brings all the tyranny that is really desired over there.

Read all the answers in the comments.

Know better? Leave your own answer!

See other posts in History and Politics

Reader Interactions

Comments ( 6 )

  1. Uncle Benito says

    Illustrator is also correct, as both spellings are acceptable in English. Since we don't use a Cyrillic alphabet, all words have a variety of acceptable spellings when transliterated. That being said, I prefer "tsar", as it is closer in sound to the original Russian "Царь".

    Now, to answer your question: Russia was infinitely better off under the tsars. Yes, there were problems, but none of the tsars were bloodthirsty tyrants hellbent on imposing his ideology on the Russian people by way of a bloodbath of epic proportions like Lenin and Stalin did.

    Reply
  2. warren v says

    I suspect that with time, Russia under the Tzar's would have been a much better place than under communist rule. At the time of the rise of communism the world was changing for the better but sadly not fast enough to prevent communism form sounding good to people of the time or people that were too impatient to wait for "change".

    Reply
  3. This is not America says

    Definitely the Soviets. Both were horrible regimes but less people starved under the USSR

    Reply
  4. illustrator5 says

    It is Czar first off. Depends on which one you look at…Czar Nicholas II was over thrown in 1917 due to many failures: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_II_of_Russi…

    I had grandparents who fled Finland at that time because the Red Army (communists) took over. They came to their house told their oldest 18 year old son he would serve under them and he refused. They took him outside and slaughtered him in front of his family….so it depends on your perspective.

    Reply
  5. OlcayKar-Turkey says

    Tsar. because there were bourgeoisie class, called Gulak. Stalin destroyed them , sent them to Siberia. so, Soviet Union became heavy state

    Reply
  6. cUinNOV says

    The Tsars the soviets under stalin was a disaster…

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Popular Posts

Pushkin's Tatiana writing a letter to Onegin

Onegin’s Tatiana Was Only Thirteen?

Russian shashlik

My Favorite Russian Food

Dacha – Home Away From Home

Subway Dog

Subway Dogs of Moscow

Cape Cod on the Rocks

What is a cocktail with vodka and cranberry juice called?

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Pat on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • Ted on Where can i send free SMS messages to Russian mobiles?
  • PutinPow on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • bigdogg on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • HAMISH A McDONALD on What Russia would be like today if Nicholas II had not been executed?

Copyright RussianBest.com © 2025 · About · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer: RussianBest.com is an informational website, and its content does not constitute professional advice of any kind.