• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Russian Best

Russian Life & People Digest

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Questions and Answers
    • History and Politics
    • Culture and Science
    • People and Language
    • Lifestyle and Attributes
    • Russian Sports
    • Food and Drinks
    • Traveling Russia
    • Economy and Geography
    • Russian Military
    • Books & Movies
Browse: Home / History and Politics

Why did Gorbachev choose reforms loosing the power for the country?

Question by Andy N: Why did Gorbachev choose reforms when it could mean the loss of power for the country?
Why did Gorbachev and the Soviet leadership undertake democratization and economic liberalization even at the risk of reducing their own power? Why did the reforms lead to the collapse of the Soviet Union?

Answers and Views:

Answer by PDY
The system wasn’t working and they knew they had to try something new. Unfortunately, they went about it in a helter skelter way – trying one thing this month, another next month. It created chaos in the economy and it was clear that the administration was desperate. But the ultimate collapse had more to do with their invasion of Afghanistan. The war was bleeding the country dry financially. So when Poland and East Germany ultimately rebelled they had no resources to do anything about it.

Read all the answers in the comments.

Know better? Leave your own answer!

See other posts in History and Politics

Reader Interactions

Comments ( 2 )

  1. gen patton says

    they knew there was no need to worry about America, and they went broke trying to keep up with us. couldn't pay their army. they didn't realize you can't tax your people to death when you don't pay them anything. the big bankers of the world told them not to fret, they would see to it we would go down the tubes soon enough.

    Reply
  2. Aussie_Icon says

    Because the Union of Soviet socialists was not sustainable and the union would have collapsed anyway.

    He was a great leader who put the long term interest of his nation ahead of that of his own ambitions.

    By doing what he did he was able to at least control and manage the change rather than have change occur in a chaotic or anarchistic way which could have been devastating.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Aussie_Icon Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Popular Posts

Pushkin's Tatiana writing a letter to Onegin

Onegin’s Tatiana Was Only Thirteen?

Russian shashlik

My Favorite Russian Food

Dacha – Home Away From Home

Subway Dog

Subway Dogs of Moscow

Cape Cod on the Rocks

What is a cocktail with vodka and cranberry juice called?

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Pat on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • Ted on Where can i send free SMS messages to Russian mobiles?
  • PutinPow on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • bigdogg on What does Nazdrovia actually mean?
  • HAMISH A McDONALD on What Russia would be like today if Nicholas II had not been executed?

Copyright RussianBest.com © 2025 · About · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer: RussianBest.com is an informational website, and its content does not constitute professional advice of any kind.